The Real Point of the Redskins Name Controversy

The completely contrived "conversation" over the supposedly offensive Washington Redskins name is yet another lesson for the American citizenry and the white males who, awkwardly, still for the moment make up a great proportion of the population. That the lesson is being misrepresented by a complicit media is no surprise yet deep down the average (read: white) male sports fan knows what is really going on. For he has experienced this lesson in countless ways since childhood.

Though 79 percent of Americans have no problem whatsoever with the Redskins name, President Obama has seen fit to wade into this "issue",  lapdog media "critics" who make a comfortable living playing their role in the corrupt Washington charade present their ridiculous "solutions" and assorted fringe characters chime in on either side.

All the while the white male sports viewer grits his teeth and tries to focus on what he really cares about - the game itself. And he is well aware that this is getting harder and harder to do with each passing year.

Whether sports media behemoth ESPN is endlessly championing fringe NBA players as homosexual heroes or professional sports leagues are constantly beating the drum of Hispanic Heritage Month, Black History Month and Disabled Chipmunk Month (I may have made that last one up; then again, the NHL may indeed have celebrated that -- it's all such a blur), the white male viewer knows that these are not authentic celebrations of any individual group. He knows that the real purpose of these exercises is aimed at him.

It's the old captive audience weapon that the cultural liberal bludgeons Americans with. Liberals know they cannot win people over to their side by the merits of their arguments, for their divisive, unnatural and illogical arguments are comprehensively without merit. Thus they seek to impose their will. And since we are a supposedly free society, they must find ways to force themselves on people who have no way to simply walk away from them, i.e., the captive audience.

No American has been as beat down by this ugly stick as the white male. From an early age, he was forced to attend his parents' church and was exposed to an endless prattle of effeminate pap that he could only sit and endure, knowing he would quickly drop it all once he was old enough to make his own decisions. He was forced to attend schools where he was exposed like a lab rat to all the fashionable feminist theories of his day and told that the history of people like himself was permeated with evil. He stuck it out in pursuit of the diploma and then the degree, knowing that one day he could walk away from what he was now trapped into enduring.

Of course I know all this because I experienced it personally. One example of many: I will never forget the resentment I felt at my college freshman World Geography class that I only took to fulfill a requirement for my major curriculum. I wouldn't have even taken the class if I had my druthers, and yet, though it was a geography class, I was taught as fact (on the final exam, give the answer they want or your grade suffers) loaded lunacies such as "abortion is the oldest form of birth control in world history" and "Malthusian population control is essential for world survival." The tired bias made not a dent on me. The feeling of total exasperation at being forced to put up with this hollow propaganda - at my own rather costly expense - when all I was trying to do was satisfy a small requirement on the way to my degree sticks with me to this day. Not as something unique but as yet another of those moments that was forced on me against my will. I guess I just didn't see it coming in an introductory geography class. I guess I should have.

And then we white males became adults and saw that there were new ways designed to always keep us stuck in the captive audience. At work, we are subjected to mindless Human Resources campaigns  on diversity, workplace sensitivity and the like. That it is all so unconvincing is not the point at all. The real lesson is loud and clear: You will not be able to break away. From cradle to grave, we are going to invade your personal space and impose our worldview upon you.

Which takes us to the one diversion many white males love most: sports. All we want to do is watch the games we have loved for as long as we can remember and enjoy them. It's true that nobody is making us watch, yet as men we're hardwired to do so.

And here as well those same feelings of having something forced on us against our will resurface again and again in countless ways. Liberals really don't understand the anger white male sports fans feel at having mediocre black quarterbacks forced down our throats by the media hype machine. We want sports to be a meritocracy. We see how our modern society champions incompetence in the name of diversity and we would like to be free of this boring tyranny on the playing field, if nowhere else. It should be cut and dry: Either you can play or you can't.

Yet an endless number of "athletic" (read: black) pro quarterbacks have been foisted upon us. They have up to this point without exception been heralded as elite game changers. They have also up to this point without exception been nothing but mediocre. It's not like we're not going to notice these two things, you know. It's simply a fact of the position that pro quarterbacks who stay in the pocket and look off a DB before hitting a receiver or check off to their second or third receiving option are more successful than "athletic" (read: black) quarterbacks who run when their first receiving option is not open, even when a wide-open receiver is streaking towards the goal line. It is also more entertaining to watch a QB find the third receiver and thread a pass to him to move the team down the field than it is to watch an "athlete" take the snap, dart around end and run, run, run.

The notion that wanting to see the pro quarterback position played at its highest level is a sign of racism is beyond ludicrous. We are talking about the same fans here who accept and rabidly cheer on an NFL that is 70 percent black on the field and an NBA that is 80 percent black on the hardcourt. We don't want Vince Young quarterbacking a team for the same reason that we don't want Adam Morrison in an NBA starting lineup.

The disgruntlement with the nonstop media hype of black quarterbacks is really a sign of white male fans resenting the feeling that they are being played again, just as they have been played over and over again in all other aspects of their lives.

And that is what this fake Redskins name controversy is really all about. The fact that we are a captive audience is being driven home one more time. The liberal is imposing his perspective yet again. He's bought the games - he televises them, he owns the teams, he runs the leagues. If you want to watch, sit in your seat, absorb the propaganda and acquiesce as they take something else away from you.

Just like you once did in church. Just like you once did in school. Just like you do now at work.

The liberal is spelling it out: There is no private space for you, white American male. We will come into the things you love and turn them on you.

It comes with losing a cultural war.

Two Faces of Conditioning

They proved that this could be turned into that in the minds of millions of Americans in the blink of an eye merely to sell more of a product that kills its consumers. Doesn't matter. Content simply does not matter. Image is everything.

If they could so deftly shape masculine and feminine expression in the name of a duplicitous and deadly commerce why couldn't they also have the ability to reshape these things to suit a revolutionary aim to destroy a cohesive society?

If we could stop seeing these issues as liberal vs. conservative and red state vs. blue state and instead see the manipulation as the blatant and cheap marketing scam that it is, perhaps we can save this culture.

A century of oversized capitalism's fraudulent social programming has made a mass-cultivated populace so pliable that it passively accepts the Cultural Marxist assault on traditional human norms.

Predatory capitalism and Marxist collectivism: Two sides of the same tyrannical materialist coin.

Our demise as a free people has literally been sold to us like Coca-Cola.

The Mainstream Media Hate White Folks With Guns

This is actually reported as a straight news item in a major metropolitan newspaper...

Specifically, for each 1 point increase in symbolic racism (on a scale from one to five), there was a 50% greater chance of having a gun in the home and a 28% increase in the odds of supporting permits to carry concealed handguns.

The authors describe symbolic racism as a belief structure underpinned by an anti-black feeling established in younger years through exposure to negative stereotypes such as "blacks are dangerous."

Give it a second, it gets even more ridiculous:

"This anti-black affect is not necessarily conscious or deliberate but may be felt as fear, anger, unease and hostility towards blacks," according to the researchers.

"The symbolic component reflects the abstract view of blacks as a collective rather than as individuals, as well as its basis in abstract white moralistic reasoning and traditions," the authors state.

The extremely thin veneer of scientific research presented in this "study" would of course be immediately shattered by the most casual examination of U.S. crime rate demographics. Yet the reader is hilariously led to believe that rabid, armed white Americans are a menacing danger to blacks. This sort of BS was able to fly in the days of three television channels plus PBS and your daily local newspaper plus Time Magazine. The real truth of the matter is easy to find in the age of the Internet.

Australians want to disarm white Americans. One could care less what they think. But a major American mainstream newspaper sees fit to pass on their ravings as hard news. And "journalists" wonder why nobody takes them seriously anymore.

Honesty Simply Does Not Matter to the Emotional Cultural Liberal

I've been patiently waiting for an update on the infamous Boy With the Pink Headband at Walmart story, which went viral way, way back in August, knowing full well that of course it would be completely and universally ignored by the full-hype, short-attention-span media in a quite impressive way. And so we all just move on to the next outrageous lie.

The mother involved has now returned to the Internet after a two-month hiatus. The ramblings in her post on this affair are not interesting at all, but the comments are really something. By now most people realize this woman is clearly disturbed, yet the full logic of emotional modern American females (and effeminate men) is on vibrant display here.

This has always been the thing about cultural liberalism that has terrified me the most. Emotion trumps veracity. Hope and pray that you never get caught up in a showdown between these two things with a cultural liberal. Because he WILL put you in prison if it comes to it rather than have to come to terms with the fact that his "feelings" aren't real. 

It's a grave danger to personal freedom and to the basic decency that comes with a genuine and honest society.

So, without further ado, here are a few choice nuggets of emotional tyranny gleaned from the reader comments to this unfortunate woman's latest self-justifying post:

1. If we only knew YOU, we would mindlessly accept your ridiculous story.

It sucks to know that people think you’re a liar, but those people don’t know YOU. However, there are many who do, and they would never believe that of you. Those are the people who are truly important. Focus on them. Hugs and healing energy to all of you!

2. If we use terms like "ignorant fool" we get to claim the moral and intellectual high ground despite the total irrationality of our position.

Oh Katie, I am so very sorry that you and your family have had to be subjected to such a disgusting side of the human race! I am afraid that as the proud mother of an openly homosexual child, I would have gone completely ballistic on that ignorant fool. 

3. We don't have logic, reason or basic facts on our side yet we don't even owe an explanation because everybody else is stupid:

I didn’t know about your blog until I saw your story on Huff post, but as a new father myself who puts his only son before all else and adoring my son’s uniqueness, I want to protect him from all the miserable souls out there whom can even fathom ill will. I will do my best of course, but I highly doubt I will be able to protect him from what seems to be a growing faction in America, stupidity… I guess all I really want to say is…I am a new fan of our blog and will be reading regularly….your A-Ok in my book and again, you have nothing to be ashamed of or even need to explain….

4. It doesn't matter that you intentionally made up a bunch of BS and went public with it on a very prominent website in an attempt to garner as much attention as possible... you are the victim here:

I think it is disgusting the way that people, who do not even know you, have treated you – and for what reason do they really give? Even if you were lying (which I don’t think you were) it is still no excuse. Things have to change – people have to stop being able to troll like this and not be prosecuted.

5. It's our unfair society's fault that you were criticized more heavily for being such a blatant liar than the fictitious character you made up was for his reprehensible fictitious deed:

You know, I find myself rather disliking society as it is. I’ve pointed to you several times indicating that you were stoned, made an outcast from society, for “lying on the internet” (common consensus only).

Regardless of the veracity of the incident, there have been a plethora of people who “lie on the internet,” why do they feel they need to single you out for that innocuous crime and issue a stronger punishment than we would for the man in the incident?

6. Default terminology yet again: Everybody who doesn't live in the imaginary cultural liberal world is STUPID:

Wow, my mind is simply blown. I knew that people were disgusting, but this is an ultimate low. I can’t even comprehend what all you have experienced through this and I am so sorry!It breaks my heart that people are so nasty and cruel, and to be frank, STUPID. 

If You Think the Name of This Blog is Ridiculous...

... You obviously haven't read this inflammatory piece at Salon.com titled "Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American":

“White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for your group to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening or threatened with deportation,” writes author Tim Wise. “White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas. And if he turns out to be a member of the Irish Republican Army we won’t bomb Dublin. And if he’s an Italian-American Catholic we won’t bomb the Vatican.”

Because of these undeniable and pervasive double standards, the specific identity of the Boston Marathon bomber (or bombers) is not some minor detail — it will almost certainly dictate what kind of governmental, political and societal response we see in the coming weeks. That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.

Let us count the ways in which this shows, yet again, that you can say things about white males in the Amerika of today that you simply cannot say about any other identifiable group of people:

1. Imagine a headline to a local crime story, "Let's hope the rapist was a black man"

2. Or how about this on the latest Wall Street scandal, "Let's hope the embezzler was a Jew"?

3. Or how about, "Let's hope the man who murdered his daughter was a Muslim committing an honor killing"?

To deliberately seek out a group of individuals after a hideous crime is committed and dearly wish that they be the perpetrators just because it would endorse your personal beliefs/biases used to be the very essence of bigotry in this nation. Today it is clever liberal nuance used to spotlight the higher intellectual point: White males are the cause of all problems in the world.

Have no illusions, my fellow white male Americans: You ARE a target.

Get used to it, because things are only going to get worse.

The Mental Laziness of the Massachusetts Liberal

Gotta LOVE the stereotypical white Boston liberal, still alive and kicking after all these years:

For the students of color in the group, the selection of the first Latin American Pope was cause for optimism that the church is getting its act together, reaching out to ethnic groups who may have felt disenfranchised in the past. And all the kids we spoke with expressed hope that new leadership might find ways to bridge the generation gap.

Forget for a moment that "the first Latin American Pope" is of Italian heritage.

It's a commonly-known fact that the Church is experiencing its biggest growth in Africa and yet here is our fearless New Frontier pioneer whining about perceived slights he likely stumbled upon in some scarcely-attended aging hippie parish in Waltham. For in his mind, ostracized angelic little black Catholic kids in neat, spotless, wrinkle-free school uniforms are still being forced to drink from the segregated bubbler at Our Lady of Judgmental Severity Elementary.

Being hopelessly out of date deters him not. Reality, after all, was never the Massachusetts Liberal's strength. 

The Barren Rainbow

Love how the liberal, multicultural champion New York Times features a photo of a fertile Latino woman prominently at the top of this story it re-posted from a Texas source as a way to get the human insecticide campaign back on track.

The very same people who will accuse patriotic Americans of being knuckle-dragging racists because we want to secure the borders can't stomach the idea of these people procreating once they do make it across:

In the fiscal crunch of 2011, the [Texas] Legislature cut the state’s family-planning budget by two-thirds, with some lawmakers claiming that they were defunding the “abortion industry.” Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin, found that more than 50 family-planning clinics had closed statewide as a result.

Now, amid estimates that the cuts could lead to 24,000 additional 2014-15 births at a cost to taxpayers of $273 million,  lawmakers are seeking a way to restore financing without ruffling feathers.

The dominant slanted media is quick to always paint nationalists of any stripe as bloodthirsty fanatics eager to ethnically cleanse those who are not like them. However, those who want to preserve the established ethnological makeup of this nation have a much more humanitarian response to the real-world pressures of costly brown babies. It is simply this:

If you want fewer expensive Latino minority babies in your country, have a strong homogenous culture by, for and about your traditional ethnic makeup. Control immigration, secure the borders and preserve your national identity.

Anything else leads to demographic anarchy, violent unrest and infanticide on a massive scale.

Meanwhile, in little articles such as this, the paragons of tolerance who want to usher in a brave new borderless world reveal, every now and again, the ugliness and sheer meanness of their agenda.

Look at that second picture!

In an article pushing contraception!

The implication is ominous and obvious: This newspaper can barely stand the fact that that thing is alive.

So, to sum up: Wanting to keep these people from coming to our country illegally makes you morally bankrupt. Wanting to prevent these people from reproducing once they arrive to manicure our lawns, pick our apples and clean our offices is the height of human tenderness. Got it.